<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Memory on S3H.com</title>
    <link>https://s3h.com/tags/memory/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Memory on S3H.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://s3h.com/tags/memory/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Sandisk (SNDK) Q4 FY2026: Why a $4,000 Price Target Requires No Earnings Growth</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/sandisk-sndk-q4-fy2026-why-a-4000-price-target-requires-no-earnings-growth/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/sandisk-sndk-q4-fy2026-why-a-4000-price-target-requires-no-earnings-growth/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Sandisk closed Wednesday at $1,350.50, down 5.4% on the session, then traded toward $1,257 after the fiscal fourth quarter release put first quarter revenue guidance at $10.3 to $10.8 billion against a consensus near $11.16 billion. The stock is up roughly 490% year to date and has been the best performer in the S&amp;amp;P 500 in 2026. Its fifty-two week range runs from $40.53 to $2,354.39, the high set on June 22, and market capitalization sits near $200 billion on 148.1 million shares outstanding. Beta is 4.13. The target here is $4,000 within twelve months, and the case for it is not an earnings case.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amazon (AMZN) Up 8%, Apple (AAPL) Down 6%: AWS Grew 37% While Apple Guided Gross Margin Down to 47%</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/amazon-amzn-up-8-apple-aapl-down-6-aws-grew-37-while-apple-guided-gross-margin-down-to-47/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/amazon-amzn-up-8-apple-aapl-down-6-aws-grew-37-while-apple-guided-gross-margin-down-to-47/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Both companies beat on the top and bottom lines on Thursday evening. Amazon closed the regular session at $235.50 and traded up to roughly $252 after hours, a gain of about 7% at the print and 9% at the peak. Apple closed at $333.43 and traded down to roughly $312, a decline of more than 6%. The divergence had almost nothing to do with the quality of the two beats and almost everything to do with a single input cost that both companies discussed at length: DRAM.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Your Next Laptop Costs More: RAM Prices Are Now the Line Item That Moves</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/why-your-next-laptop-costs-more-ram-prices-are-now-the-line-item-that-moves/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/why-your-next-laptop-costs-more-ram-prices-are-now-the-line-item-that-moves/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A well-reviewed laptop got marked down this week for a reason that had nothing to do with the laptop. The Framework Laptop 13 Pro earned praise for its processor performance, its build quality, and its keyboard, and then lost points for price — with the review attributing the cost directly to high RAM prices. If you have been pricing a machine recently and wondering why the numbers look worse than they did a year ago, that is the explanation, and it is not going to reverse quickly.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
